Состав стай коридорасов

Обсуждение периодики и новинок литературы.
Ответить
Yan
Клуб
Клуб
Сообщения: 6650
Зарегистрирован: Пн ноя 14, 2005 10:26 pm
Откуда: Бат Ям
Благодарил (а): 4 раза
Поблагодарили: 15 раз
Контактная информация:

Состав стай коридорасов

Сообщение Yan » Ср янв 12, 2011 7:30 am

Исследование состава стай коридорасов показало, что они состоят из 2-3-х похожих внешне, но на самом деле – разных видов.

Competition and phylogeny determine community structure in Mullerian co-mimics
Markos A. Alexandrou, Claudio Oliveira, Marjorie Maillard, Rona A. R. McGill, Jason Newton, Simon Creer & Martin I. Taylor
Nature, Volume: 469, Pages: 84–88, Date published: 06 January 2011
Until recently, the study of negative and antagonistic interactions (for example, competition and predation) has dominated our understanding of community structure, maintenance and assembly. Nevertheless, a recent theoreticalmodel suggests that positive interactions (for example,mutualisms)may counterbalance competition, facilitating long-termcoexistence even among ecologically undifferentiated species. Mullerian mimics are mutualists that share the costs of predator education and are therefore ideally suited for the investigation of positive and negative interactions in community dynamics. The sole empirical test of this model in a Mullerian mimetic community supports the prediction that positive interactions outweigh the negative effects of spatial overlap (without quantifying resource acquisition). Understanding the role of trophic niche partitioning in facilitating the evolution and stability of Mullerian mimetic communities is now of critical importance, but has yet to be formally investigated. Here we show that resource partitioning and phylogeny determine community structure and outweigh the positive effects of Mullerian mimicry in a species-rich group of neotropical catfishes. From multiple, independent reproductively isolated allopatric communities displaying convergently evolved colour patterns, 92% consist of species that do not compete for resources. Significant differences in phylogenetically conserved traits (snout morphology and body size) were consistently linked to trait-specific resource acquisition. Thus, we report the first evidence, to our knowledge, that competition for trophic resources and phylogeny are pivotal factors in the stable evolution of Mullerian mimicry rings. More generally, our work demonstrates that competition for resources is likely to have a dominant role in the structuring of communities that are simultaneously subject to the effects of both positive and negative interactions.
Ян

Ответить